Showing posts with label coating fertilizer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coating fertilizer. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 February 2016

Phosphatic Fertilizers And Agriculture In Pakistan



Pakistan’s economy is based on agriculture but still, Pakistan is facing a shortage of grains in the country, there is a big gap between supply and demand. Wheat is an important cereal crop worldwide as well as in Pakistan. In Pakistan, the average yield potential is much less than growing countries of the world. A deficit of wheat supply is very often in the country and Government is imposed to import wheat by allocating an enormous amount of foreign exchange. To fulfill the demand it is important to maximize the cultivation of food grains. There are different reasons of low wheat production in our country as delay in wheat sowing due to a late vocation of rice field and low availability of phosphorus (P) due to its fixation in our soils. 


Application of Fertilizers

The increase in grain yield is related to an increased application of fertilizer or more truly the increased uptake of nutrients. Soil nutrient statistics important for maintaining high quality and sustainable crop production. It is very important to maintain soil nutrients at a sufficient level, to maintain optimum plant growth. Application of fertilizers is optional because their costs are too high for farmer, so high use of these fertilizers is not profitable. Almost all the soils in Pakistan have poor fertility status due to lack of organic matter and arid climate as soils developed under severe climate are poor in organic matter and nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur. Phosphorus (P) is one of the most important growth-limiting nutrients. Phosphorus is a naturally occurring element that can be found in the earth’s crust and all living organisms. In plants, it plays a vital role in many physiological processes such as the promotion of early heading and uniform maturity, a growth of early root and seedling, It also supports seed formation, increases seed quality and water-use efficiency. Phosphorus is also important during major biochemical processes like respiration, cell division, photosynthesis, storage and transfer of energy.


 


Conditions of Pakistani Soils


Most Pakistani soils are alkaline having pH > 7.0 as well as calcareous (CaCO3 > 3.0%) in nature. Phosphorus fixation is a severe problem in alkaline and calcareous soils. When Phosphatic fertilizers are applied to the soil, < 1% of it becomes part of soil solution for uptake by plants. While remaining goes to exchange sites and it is either adsorbed or precipitated. The average recovery of phosphorus fertilizer by crops is very low and varies from 15-20% on single crop basis. It is estimated that phosphorus recovery in alkaline calcareous soil is 0.02 to 0.5%. This is because of the high phosphorus fixation property of our soils. It is estimated that 80-90% of Pakistani soils fall in the range between low to medium in phosphorus concentration and high in calcareous. According to a study, Punjab province is losing phosphorus at a rate of 0.016 ppm per year. This may be attributed to reversion of applied phosphates to less available forms such as coat-calcium phosphates, carbonate apatite, hydroxide apatite and flour apatite by reacting with clay and calcium compounds. Applying good source of fertilizers may resolve this problem.

Sunday, 7 February 2016

An Advancment in Nitrogen Fixation by Endophyte

Now a days, a lot of new technologies have been implied to boost up N availability such as use of N fixing microorganisms or use of organic acids. But little attention has been given to the use of endophytes to enhance the N availability and nitrogen losses. Endophytes are micro-organisms that live within the tissues of a plant, without causing symptoms of disease. Endophytes can be used to develop bio-fertilizer that releases nitrogen slowly. Therefore, now researchers are focusing on the use of endophytic bacterial impregnation to prolong the availability of N in soil to replenish the pool of N to meet the plant requirements.

Controlled Release Fertilizers:  

Controlled-release fertilizers are being developed to improve nutrient use efficiency while reducing environmental hazards. It has also been reported that greater fruit yield was obtained using controlled-release fertilizers compared with water soluble fertilizers. These types of fertilizers can provide many benefits to agriculture, such as higher fertilizer use efficiency, reduced nutrient losses via fixation, leaching and denitrification and reduction of soil chemical processes that decrease the availability of nutrients. Therefore impregnation of commercial urea with endophytic bacteria could be effective to pro log the availability of nitrogen to plants in soil.

Experiments at Endophytic Efficiency:  

To investigate the efficiency of endophytic bacterial impregnated urea, pot trial was conducted at wire house of Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Two bacterial strains FD17 and PSJN were impregnated on urea. There were 8 treatments with 3 replications of each. The data regarding growth, yield and chemical parameters was obtained and analyzed statistically. Obtaining best results of T8 and preceding T5, it was concluded that endophytic bacterial impregnated urea showed maximum growth and yield as compared to other treatments. It was inferred that endophytes are helpful in prevention of nitrogen losses and enhance nitrogen use efficiency of plants and soil.

Results of study:  

Results of study indicated that wheat crop responded positively to the application of endophytic bacterial impregnated urea as compared to uncoated urea and control (no NPK was applied). Maximum plant heights were obtained from T5 (NPK + Seed inoculated both strains FD17 and PSJN) and T8 (Urea impregnated with strains FD17 and PSJN) Bacterial strain FD17 and PSJN coating on urea were found to be superior in most of the yield and growth parameters. Treatment (T8) having endophytic bacterial impregnated urea concentration improved the N concentration in shoot (2.61%) as compared to uncoated urea (T2) in which N concentration of shoot.  Application of endophytic bacterial impregnated urea improved the growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of crop. The maximum chlorophyll content was recorded in plants which received treatment T8 (PK + Urea impregnated with strains FD17 and PSJN) following T5 (NPK + Seed inoculated both strains FD17 and PSJN) and T7 (NPK + Seed inoculated both strains FD17 and PSJN) and these treatments produced 48, 47 and 45 spad value, respectively chlorophyll contents. Because endophytic bacterial impregnated urea converted it into more available form for a longer period as it slowed down the release of N. In T8 where endophytic bacterial impregnated urea with 100% recommended rate showed the highest percentage of nitrogen (as compare to uncoated urea) in grains. Overall experiment results suggested that coated urea as N source significantly increased most of the growth and yield parameters. Obtaining best results of T8 and preceding T5, it was concluded that endophytic bacterial impregnated urea showed maximum growth and yield as compared to other treatments. Endophytic bacterial impregnated urea has following benefits over un-impregnated urea:
  •  Increased nutrients uptake and hence their use efficiency.
  •  Performed better than uncoated N fertilizers.
  •  Reduction in losses of N that resulted in more availability of N in soil.
  •  Released the nutrients slowly and made it available throughout the growth period.
  •  Reduced the fertilizer application rate due to higher uptake compared to uncoated urea.

CONCLUSION:

Keeping in view the above discussion, it can be concluded that use of slow release fertilizers more specifically endophytic bacterial coated fertilizers has significant effect on the growth and yield of crops and vegetables by controlling nutrient release rate and nutrient use efficiency.
By: Shoaib Aslam

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Coated Fertilizers And Agriculture

Many technologies have been implied to boost up phosphorus (P) solubility such as use of P solubilizing microorganisms or use of organic acids. But little attention has been given to the use of organic polymer to enhance the P availability. Organic polymer can be used to develop phosphatic fertilizer that releases phosphorus (P) slowly. The organic polymer (complex organic compounds) absorbs water more efficiently and keeps the P in available form. The organic polymer can hold water many times of its weight and prolong the availability of P to plant roots. Phosphatic fertilizers with organic polymers are usually termed as slow releasing fertilizer because these fertilizers provide P to plants at slower rate but regularly. Therefore, now researchers are focusing on the use of polymer for DAP (diammonium phosphate) coating to prolong the availability of P in soil to replenish the pool of P to meet the plant requirements. Controlled-release fertilizers are being developed to improve nutrient use efficiency while reducing environmental hazards.

Controlled-Release Fertilizers:

It has also been reported that greater fruit yield was obtained using controlled-release fertilizers compared with water soluble fertilizers. This type of fertilizer can provide many benefits to agriculture, such as higher fertilizer use efficiency, reduced nutrient losses via fixation, leaching and denitrification and reduction of soil chemical processes that decrease the availability of nutrients, such as the fixation of P. Therefore coating of commercial DAP with organic polymer could be effective to prolog the availability of phosphorus to plants in soil.

Experiment at Coated DAP:  

To investigate the efficiency of polymer coated DAP, field trial was conducted at research area of Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Different rates of organic polymer coated DAP (100, 75 and 50%) were applied in comparison with uncoated DAP. Data regarding plant height, number of tillers m-2, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and total grain yield were collected. Results of the study obtained after statistical analysis are summarized as under.

Results for Coated DAP:

Results of study indicated that wheat crop responded positively to the application of polymer coated DAP as compared to uncoated DAP and control (no P was applied). Application of polymer coated DAP improved the growth, yield and nutritional aspects of crop. 100% polymer coated DAP was found to be superior in most of the yield and growth parameters. Because polymer coating on DAP converted it into more available form for a longer period as it slowed down the release of P. Overall experiment results suggested that polymer coated DAP as P source significantly increased most of the growth and yield parameters. Polymer coated DAP has following benefits over uncoated DAP.

Polymer coated DAP: 
  • Increased nutrients uptake and hence their use efficiency.
  • Performed better than uncoated DAP.
  • Reduction in soil fixation of P that resulted in more availability of P in soil.
  • Released the nutrients slowly and made it available throughout the growth period.
  • Reduced the fertilizer application rate due to higher uptake compared to uncoated.

References:

  1. Murphy, L and L. Sanders. 2007. Improving N and P efficiency with polymer technology.         Ind. CCA Conf. Pro. 1-13.
  2. NFDC. 1997. Fertilizer Recommendations for Crops. pp. 33-46. In. “Fertilizer Recommendations in Pakistan (a pocket guide for extension workers)”. National Fertilizer Development Center, Islamabad, Pakistan
By : Shoaib Aslam